“Something troubling you, Sebastian?” [John Scared] asked.
Despite what those closest to me seem to believe, or may try to tell you, I do actually read things besides Sherlock Holmes. Now, my reading habits tend to lean towards all things British, all things nineteenth century, and all things mystery (with a sharp turn towards detective fiction). I confess this fully, and without embarrassment. However, occasionally, I’ve picked up a book with the full intention of leaving the Great Detective to himself for awhile, and something Sherlockian manages to make an appearance in my reading material anyway.
I began to wonder if there wasn’t some sort of point to all of these references (which I won’t bore you with enumerating in their entirety, and I’m certain you have some of your own). I began to wonder if there wasn’t something to be said for them. It is entirely likely that at least some of these references are each author’s own personal regard for Sherlock Holmes, and that can answer away many of the more flippant references to street names and books on shelves. But Colonel Moran, true to form, proved to be a trickier devil for me to shake off.
And I began wonder… what if we look at it as a type of reminder, and not just some glorified bon mot on the part of the author? What if we were to think of it as the alarm that occasionally goes off on our internal clocks? That’s a large part of what detective fiction is all about, yes? It reminds us to look around. To see and observe. To notice the stain on the wall, the footprints in the grass, and the fingerprints on the chandelier, if necessary. To remember that no one is innocent and no one is guilty; not until we have the evidence to back it all up.
After all, in Talking About Detective Fiction (2009), P.D. James reminds us:
“…the detective story produces a reassuring relief from the tensions and responsibilities of daily life; it is particularly popular in times of unrest, anxiety and uncertainty, when society can be faced with problems which no money, political theories or good intentions seem able to solve or alleviate. And here in the detective story we have a problem at the heart of the novel, and one which is solved, not by luck or divine intervention, but by human ingenuity, human intelligence and human courage. It confirms our hope that, despite some evidence to the contrary, we live in a beneficent and moral universe in which problems can be solved by rational means and peace and order restored from communal or personal disruption and chaos.”
What I’ve come to realize is that when I stumble across a Sherlockian reference in the least likely of stories, the references mean more than a casual wink and nod at a knowing reader, it’s a reminder that, no matter how deep into the mires of insanity the story may have fallen, we will manage to dig out. There will be a solution, and a satisfying one, and it will make sense. Even if you have to tilt your head and squint for it to do so. Rights will be righted, and wrongs will be punished; and even if something or someone manages to escape, it shall all fit together in the end. And we will do it together, if only because we can.
So the next time I’m reading a book and the Diogenes Club or the Giant Rat of Sumatra or a Persian slipper filled with tobacco makes an unexpected appearance, I’ll probably still smile, raise an eyebrow, or even laugh (to the unending confusion of those dearest to me), but more importantly, I’ll be relieved. Because I’ll know that we’re going somewhere—this book, the author, and I—that it will have a point, and it will make sense. And I’ll be more likely to stick through to the end. Because that’s what Holmes would do.
It may seem a rather oblique method of conveyance, but I prefer to think of it as a careful one. As the man himself once said, "They say that genius is an infinite capacity for taking pains…It's a very bad definition, but it does apply to detective work (STUD).”
COMING SOON: Book Review--The Sherlockian, by Graham Moore.